Class B AIS, U.S. gets it last?

RadarPlus 3The good folks at Shine Micro sent over an update on their own Class B AIS product, RadarPlus, and the general state of the category:

* RadarPlus really exists, units licensed for experimental use are in the field (right), and test results are “very pleasing.” (Though, no surprise, receiver sensitivity does really matter with these 2 watt units; more on that in September).

* However, “dealer programming of the MMSI is definitely coming for North American users”, and “The FCC can be expected to take a minimum of 4 months to digest all the comments they are receiving on the latestFurther Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order’” (in .pdf here).

* Which is why Shine isn’t currently predicting “any date for FCC approval of AIS Class B”, but does “like Comar and True Heading, plan on shipping units internationally in late October.”

I searched through that .pdf above, plus the FCC site, for more on this MMSI/Class B business, but without success. Anyone? It might also be interesting to see who has applied for Class B licenses.

Similar Posts:


The U.S. AIS B problem, a Shiney smart workaround
June 8, 2008

FCC approves 1st Class B, now what?
April 9, 2007

AIS, this ‘n’ that #6
June 12, 2007

Class B & the FCC, sounds good
April 16, 2007



Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now excited to have Ben Stein as very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Panbo is going to the next level in 2019 and beyond.

1 Response

  1. Paul says:

    I found some mention of AIS class B MMSI programming in FCC 06-108, section 4C, paragraph 64 (page 45).
    They say “We seek comments regarding means which could be employed to ensure that userprogrammed
    as well as dynamic data on AIS units used on non-compulsory ships is accurate.”
    That’s all I saw.
    -Paul

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.