SeaLinks AIS listener, & more

SeaLinks SL161RThe horrid run of foul weather has finally broken here, and I’m happily on Cape Cod for a few days of “researching” a cruising story…so posting may be irregular this week. I did have a couple of very illuminating conversations about AIS listeners last Friday that I want to start sharing. It seems that the technology is moving even faster than we realized; two reliable sources predict that most every brand of plotter will read AIS target messages by next February’s Miami Boat Show! I also heard an interesting report on receiver quality. One of my sources says he tested a SeaLinks RadarPlus dual channel listener against a low cost Chinese-built model, and—given the same antenna and circumstances—the RadarPlus “saw” twice as many targets at almost twice the range. I look forward to my own testing, and yours, but right now I have to go boating.

Similar Posts:


Now it’s the Si-Tex/Nasa/Nobeltec AIS receiver
October 18, 2005

The U.S. AIS B problem, a Shiney smart workaround
June 8, 2008

Class B AIS, U.S. gets it last?
August 28, 2006

More AIS listener, hard & soft
June 23, 2005

Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now excited to have Ben Stein as very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Panbo is going to the next level in 2019 and beyond.

3 Responses

  1. Eli says:

    Really interesting. I wonder if the AIS listeners on new plotters will suffer the same lack of reciever consistency that can be seen with the Sealinks vs. cheaper Chinese alternative.

  2. Dan says:

    Hey Ben,
    Some softweare packages, like my Macintosh-based GPSNavX , have been able to read & plot AIS for quite a while already. Where have the Garmin, Furuno and Raymarine boys been all this time? (grin)
    regards,

  3. Anonymous says:

    I’d be interested in a proper head-to-head comparison, as I did a comparison of this “cheaper Chinese alternative” vs a very expensive Nauticast DS unit & found the Chinese unit to be better than the US$3500 Nauticast (which of course is a full transceiver, therefore the higher price).
    My findings are at:
    http://www.jodael.com/sr162_performance_testing.htm
    Dave

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.