Real, Synthetic & Virtual AIS AtoNs, can you see them?

Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now excited to have Ben Stein as very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Panbo is going to the next level in 2019 and beyond.

31 Responses

  1. Shanti says:

    We just transited through Key West, fl. There are virtual beacons for the harbor approach that show up on the marine traffic site but I didn’t see them at all on my Garmin suite (6212 and 8212) as well as on Coastal Explorer.

  2. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Thanks, Shanti (Brian), though that’s not what I was hoping to hear! Is your AIS data getting to the target displays via NMEA 0183 or 2000? So far I have not been able to determine if AIS message 21 has been translated into a N2K data message (PGN), though I’ll be astounded if it hasn’t.
    Incidentally, it looks like all the experimental AIS AtoNs that went live last month in Key West and along the west coast of FL are Synthetic: http://goo.gl/tRmV6t
    Also, if you could see those Synthetic AIS AtoNs on your nav displays, do think they would be useful? Virtual danger AtoNs seem undeniably valuable but Synthetic/Real ones may take some getting used to, if we do get to see them on our nav screens at all!

  3. Pavel says:

    Ben…
    Virtual AtoNs show just fine on OpenCPN. I posted you a screenshot at http://postimg.org/image/hbiwz1z5r/

  4. Dan Corcoran (b393capt) says:

    Yes, if I could see Synthetic AIS AtoN’s on my nav displays, and their positions were updated within weeks of aids being moved, that could be “useful”. Perhaps not valuable, but useful.
    When aid’s go missing, I would upgrade from useful to valuable, especially if they appear on our chart plotters differently for synthetic (I know to look for them as I pass) vs. virtual.

  5. Richard C says:

    I was just wondering, Who’s responsibility is it for processing the AIS AtoN’s,- the AIS receiver or is it a function of Coastal Explorer / Garmin to accept the AIS message 21? Do I need to wait for a software update from my Vesper AIS XB8000 or is the chartplotter and charting software holding up displaying the data?
    I can see many situation where a virtual AIS AtoN would be very helpful.

  6. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Well done, Pavel, though your screen shows that many of the traffic scheme AtoNs off San Francisco are Virtual, not Synthetic as I thought.
    I can’t find a detail list of the SF AIS AtoNs but it looks like you’re making the correct data translations. And when I look at the density map more carefully and think about the use, it makes sense to put Virtual AtoNs right in the fairway where ships can navigate right over them without hitting anything.
    You do seem to be using IEC edition 1 Virtual icons instead of the dashed line version in ed 2 and also wouldn’t it be more correct in your Target Query to interpret the Flag as “Real or Synthetic” instead of just “Real”?
    Also, may we presume that you are using NMEA 0183 AIS data? Have you tried the NMEA 2000 version?
    At any rate, I’m going to add your screen as a PS. Thanks!

  7. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Good news about NMEA 2000 support for AtoN message 21 from Jeff Robbins of Vesper Marine (slightly edited):
    “Yeah it’s there… PGN 129041 is AIS Aids to Navigation Report. Our transponders produce it. I think NMEA added it in V2,00 (Jan 2013).
    Virtual vs. Synthetic shouldn’t matter for the display since they both use message 21 and it’s just a flag bit and some minor differences in the interpretation. All our WatchMate displays and transponders since the very first one have displayed AIS AtoN’s and they support real, synthetic and virtual.
    As you know, we have lots of customers using virtual AtoN’s via our Virtual AIS Beacon and they report that about 70-80% of ships have visibility on their ECDIS or other displays.”
    So, Richard, the Vesper XB8000 on your boat and mine can output AIS AtoN PGNs. If they don’t show on our displays that will be because the manufacturer is not yet supporting the PGN. Both parties have to play.

  8. Richard C says:

    Ben and Jeff,
    Thanks for that info on the XB8000. It’s too cold here for me to check on the boat. I did send an email to Coastal Explorer and received an immediate reply regarding their AIS AtoN Message 21 capability and yes, they also have had the capability for some time.
    Coastal Explorer support told me this must be turned on to enable. Go to, “Main Menu > Options > AIS > Show Aids to Navigation” and you should see the AIS AtoN targets on the Coastal Explorer chart.

  9. Xavi itz says:

    We just sailed back to Palm Beach (from Canada) and were surprised to find one AToN at the first starboard buoy of a number of inlets.
    Our B&G Zeus and Zeus Touch displays showed a rhombus with a cross inside for each.
    I do not think those were in place when we left in May.
    I would speculate the atoNs were physical because the AIS locations matched so perfectly the radar returns. But have no insight. The AtoNs displayed only MMSI, lat/Lon, and a cryptic vessel name, if I recall correctly, of the type LWRTENT or so (lake worth entrance????)
    I was disappointed the AtoNs were on the first starboard buoy for each channel and not on the sea buoy, because as we sailed from Georgia we hugged the coast but outside each inlet’s sea buoy
    Synthetic or virtual atoNs are scary. If a buoy becomes unmoored and 10 years from now one is on “smart” autopilot following atoNs, one will be likely to hit the physical unmoored/moved buoy and sink.

  10. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Thanks Xavi!
    I agree with your preference for marking sea buoys, but that’s usually where they start. In fact, I can see the AIS AtoN named “LW INLET LB LW” off Lake Worth on Marine Traffic and am confident that it’s a Synthetic AtoN corresponding to the sea buoy “Lake Worth Lighted Buoy LW.”
    I also found the elusive list of East Florida AIS AtoNs buried in the 1-15 LNM:
    http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=lnmDistrict&region=7
    But I don’t understand “Synthetic or virtual atoNs are scary.” Both types are just data broadcast from a tower on shore; they can’t move on their own. One of the benefits of a Synthetic AtoN is that it stays on location even if the physical buoy it corresponds to sinks or drifts away. Even a Real AIS AtoN is designed to know when the buoy it’s on goes off station and broadcast that fact, though of course the AIS display software has to know how to make users aware of that.
    What seems to scare some people about AIS AtoNs is the notion that Virtual ones will eventually replace existing physical aids. The USCG is certainly not doing that now, but obviously it might make sense eventually.

  11. Howard says:

    They show up with proper icons and data on my TZT using either the FA150 or the Link8 as the receiver
    USCG Puget Sound AtoN presentation: http://goo.gl/oz3QZg

  12. rxc says:

    I was off Cape Canaveral 2 weeks ago, but didn’t know about the ATON there. Too bad. Would have been interesting to see how it displayed. We did see two large cruise ships leaving Port Canaveral, though, and AIS was very useful in understanding what they were and where they were going.
    I think the Vitual ATONs would be useful for inlets where the channel shifts frequently, so that the CG doesn’t have to move the markers. However, if they get used to this, the CG could quickly decide that a lot of other markers should become virtual, as well. Not necessarily a good move – some of us like to see the physical marker (especially if it is a fixed marker).
    Another benefit for the CG from virtual markers is that it would force more boats to use AIS, which makes their task of tracking boats easier. Of course, boats that don’t want to be seen will turn off their AIS transmissions, though.

  13. Pavel says:

    Ben…
    The screenshot shows what comes in the NMEA0183 stream from SF bay area available online.
    OpenCPN shows pure virtual AtonS as virtual, the properties window I had open is just by accident showing an AtoN siting on a real buoy.
    I have put the upgrade of the symbols to v2 on my list, now that we know how they look πŸ™‚

  14. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Thanks, Howard! Can I presume that your TZT is getting AIS data from the FA150 via NMEA 0183 or Ethernet and from the Lowrance Link-8 VHF via NMEA 2000?
    Also, in the TZT settings menu you can enable screenshots as a two-finger tap gesture πŸ˜‰
    The Feb. 2014 USCG presentation you linked to doesn’t have much text but I noticed that two “eNav Challenge” listed is:
    β€’ Electronic ATON (e-ATON) Symbology – International Agreement Pending (expected CY 14)
    (Which seems to confirm my sense that AIS AtoN icons and data display is pretty new and may not have made many of our displays yet.)
    β€’ Expanding AIS to all US Waters – Currently in Routing
    (Which I think references a major expansion of AIS mandates on U.S. commercial vessels that may finally be ‘routing’ its way out of the federal bureaucracy πŸ˜‰

  15. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Thanks, Pavel. The point I was trying to make is that the Harding Rock AIS AtoN is Synthetic not Real, I’m pretty sure. But I have to admit that the Message 21 listing ( http://goo.gl/g2oGhP ) is confused on this subject, describing the Virtual AtoN flag bit as either:
    0 = default = real AtoN at indicated position
    or
    1 = virtual AtoN, does not physically exist.
    This definition makes it impossible to flag a Synthetic AtoN. However, the IEC symbology recommendations seen above clearly show that Real and Synthetic AIS AtoNs are meant to be treated the same.
    So shouldn’t the “0” flag be interpreted as “Real or Synthetic”? OpenCPN could be in the vanguard πŸ˜‰

  16. Howard says:

    The FA-150 is connect through a Furuno NMEA0183 to NMEA 2000 IF2K converter, and the Lowrance is on the N2K as well. I have turned off the AIS output.
    Screenshots, hopefully this afternoon, if I can receive the ATON from Lake Washington.

  17. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Cool. Pavel tipped me to the HD-SF AIS feed now hosted by the fabulous SF Exploritorium: http://hd-sf.com/
    It works as a data port in Coastal Explorer like it does in OpenCPN and I’m watching ships, tugs and pilot boats working around the San Francisco TSS right now.
    As Richard learned, CE shows AIS AtoNs if you turn them on. The icons for Virtuals don’t seem to IEC code yet, but Rosepoint did a semi-clever thing with the Virtual flag. It’s expressed as either Yes or No, so a Real or Synthetic is not really identified but also not misidentified πŸ˜‰

  18. Mark Davies says:

    Thanks Ben, very interesting post. Last week the grounding of the Hoegh Osaka in the Southampton waterway in the UK showed some of the benefits of Virtual AtoN. In this case, the “wreck” was quickly marked by virtual AtoN transmitted from a nearby “physical” AIS AtoN mounted on Calshot Tower. The configuration was carried out remotely. See:
    http://www.srt-marinesystems.com/case-study/virtual-aton/

  19. ValkyrieYachts says:

    A great use, when the virtual system is more “mainstream” will be fields of lobster/crab traps, especially when they are near the entrance to harbors! They are actually dangerous, but it is legal to drop them all over the front of a breakwater here in California. It would be great if a target was showing on the MFD.
    As to the concern of AIS on a real object and what if the object is loose, you have the problem in the dark regardless. Radar? FLIR? Eyes?
    AIS is just more information that you can use, or not use.

  20. IanR says:

    Anchoring in a popular anchorage is always a worry, especially with boats coming in late that are not aware of where all the anchors are. Putting a buoy on the anchor has issues that have been discussed endlessly on various fora.
    I wonder, therefore, if one day the technology and rules will develop so that the class B AIS of the future may allow us to identify a virtual AtoN for our anchor drop point so that other AIS equipped vessels coming in to the anchorage can see where it is?
    Just day dreaming.

  21. JoeH says:

    International Standard IEC 62288 Edition 2, Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Presentation of navigation-related information on shipborne navigational displays – General requirements, methods of testing and required test results, published July 2014, specifies requirements for the presentation of navigation-related information on shipborne navigational displays in support of IMO requirements.
    It is here that AtoN symbols, both physical and virtual, and specified. Any ECDIS or radar that is IEC 62288 Ed2-compliant and connected to an AIS should display these symbols.
    You can view the virtual AtoN symbologogy requirements from a screenshot extract of the standard here: http://postimg.org/image/vdso51l1r/. The standard is otherwise copyrighted and available for purchase from either the IEC or ANSI website.
    By the way, IEC 62288 Ed2 contains requirements for display of a plethora of other AIS symbol, including ships in different maneuvering situations, SARTs, AIS on aircraft, and several application specific messages (eg maritime safety information, meteorological information, tidal and water level) as well.

  22. SheltieJim says:

    IMHO, one of the most valuable things about the new AIS AtoN technologies — especially the virtual AtoNs — is that countries without sufficient financial resources to place and main physical AtoNs can almost certainly find ways to use single (somewhat tall) towers to create virtual AtoNs for dozens, possibly hundreds, of otherwise non-existent, but definitely needed, markers. The Bahamas come to mind as an ideal place to start πŸ™‚

  23. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Thanks, Joe, and good to see that the finished AIS AtoNs are the same as the draft version I published above. I realize that the material is copyrighted but I believed that my use of less than one page out of 120 meets the fair use doctrine. And I wouldn’t have found it at all except that the USCG published some excerpts (with typos I fear) and the IHO made the whole IEC 6228 Ed 2 draft doc Google searchable:
    http://iho.int/mtg_docs/com_wg/CSPCWG/CSPCWG9/CSPCWG9-INF1_Draft_IEC_62288_Ed2.pdf
    Note that I entirely endorse the IEC’s right amd need to charge for publications, but hopefully no sane manufacturer would use the draft version to create products.

  24. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Excellent point, SheltieJim. I’ve been travelling all day — to a boat in North Carolina almost as cold as Maine! — but before I left I had the opportunity to see the San Francisco AIS AtoNs overlaid on the latest raster charts, and it’s a beautiful integration. I’m also obsessed with the saga of the auto carrier Hoegh Osaka that Mark mentioned above and I hope to wrap that all into a followup entry tomorrow.

  25. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    This probably explains why Shanti couldn’t see the AIS AtoNs around Key West. Garmin reports that “According to the engineers, that PGN {129041, corresponding to AIS AtoN message 21} isn’t currently supported by the AIS 600 and also isn’t supported by the MFD’s chartplotters.”
    I suggested that PGN 129041 support go to the top of the to-do list and have some confidence that it will be fixed soon as Garmin is particularly responsive to safety issues.

  26. Dan Corcoran (b393capt) says:

    Scary? Hmm, don’t get it.
    If anything is a little scary (just a little) is an amateur boater getting the misconception the virtual AIS information is exactly correct, based on past experiences with a set of channel marks, not appreciating that atmospheric conditions on the boats GPS receiver can have the effect later that night making the “real” position of the boat on the MFD and the “virtual” position of the mark (not subject to atmospheric conditions or current in the channel) appear a boat width apart, when actually it is in the path of the boat.
    Would that be AIS assisted collision, GPS assisted collision, both or neither? πŸ™‚

  27. Steve says:

    Hi Ben,
    FYI and your readers our Boat Beacon iPhone and Android app and our free Boat Watch apps both show AtoN’s, marking them with the correct buoy or marker they are describing and also lists in the details view whether they are virtual or not and if they are “on station” – e.g. haven’t drifted.
    There is a screen shot here showing lots of AtoNs of various types on the approach to New York
    http://boatbeaconapp.com/atons/IMG_3687.PNG
    and here is the description
    http://boatbeaconapp.com/atons/IMG_3688.PNG
    http://boatbeaconapp.com

  28. Jim Hebert Jim Hebert says:

    The USCG recently began transmitting signals for AIS AtoN targets in my area, the Detroit River, Lake St. Clair, St. Clair River, and Lake Huron. I have received some AIS AtoN Synthetic targets and show how they are displayed on a first-generation Lowrance HDS-8 chart plotter at
    http://continuouswave.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=229
    I was surprised the first-generation HDS-8 was able to show these targets. Its firmware was last updated almost four years ago (February 2012). It was nice to discover that Lowrance/Navico were ahead of the game and their older product could show AIS AtoN targets.

  29. Rob says:

    I have just installed a Raymarine C125 MFD and an Actisense NGW-1-ISO-AIS to partner with my existing Vesper Watchmate 850. While the vesper and PC using opencpn directly connected to it correctly display AIS ATONs, the Raymarine display via the actisense gateway shows only vessels. All are on latest release software/firmware. Does anyone have any idea what’s going on with that? Conflicting implementation of standards? Lack of implementation of standards? A well hidden software switch I am yet to discover? Any and all help and suggestions welcome!
    Thanks all

  30. Anonymous says:

    Actisense tech support replied, and they tell me that:
    “AIS AtoN (NMEA 2000 PGN 129041) is not currently supported by the NGW-1. We are planning to add this conversion to the next release of NGW-1 firmware. Unfortunately I cannot say when this new firmware is expected to be available.”
    Which I find a disappointing. It seems unless you install a native NMEA 2000 AIS unit, you are out of luck for now. I do enjoy the Vesper style warnings and low power setup so I want to stay with that unit, I wish actisense would keep up with the standards and real world capability of AIS. To get chart overlay of AIS ATONs I have connected the Vesper unit directly to a PC via USB, leaving the Raymarine MFD out of the equation for now.

  31. Anonymous says:

    Garmin MFDs and AIS units still do not support N2K PGN 129041.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.