NMEA & IBEX 2013 awards, winners & explanations

Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now excited to have Ben Stein as very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Panbo is going to the next level in 2019 and beyond.

9 Responses

  1. thedon says:

    You’ve got to be freaking kidding me… Humminbird 360 and a basic App won awards?? Did they actually test anything??

  2. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Nope, not kidding, Don. And Nobeltec TimeZero was honored by two sets of judges. Why do you characterize it is as “a basic App” and what’s wrong with Humminbird 360?
    And how would it be remotely possible for either set of judges to test every nominated product? Do you know any similar tech award program that’s able to pull that off?

  3. Rick R says:

    I am very pleased to see that an app won an award. Nobeltec Time Zero certainly is a worthy winner. However, I think that it is odd that an app would win, but the iPad didn’t. I presume that Apple is not a NMEA member, so does this mean that only NMEA members are eligible?
    PS: Bill Bishops saga of his 30 hour flight back to Sarasota is a hoot.

  4. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Well, Rick, speaking of giant tech companies — but on the dark side — I’m sorry to report that there’s yet another patent suit in the little marine electronics industry. Furuno has requested the (U.S.) International Trade Commission to stop the importation by Garmin, Navico, and Raymarine of “certain navigation products, including GPS devices, navigation and display systems, radar systems, navigational aids, mapping systems, and related software that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. …” http://goo.gl/VX0j1t
    For me what’s especially noteworthy is that the complaint was publicly filed on Sept. 23, just days before I attended a relatively tiny conference also attended by at least fairly senior U.S. sales and/or product managers from all four of the companies involved. But I never heard a peep about this litigation!
    In fact, what I think I saw yet again in San Diego — and you can sense it in the entry above — was quite a lot of comradery and graciousness even amongst fierce competitors. I’m beginning to think that all these patent fights are quite compartmetalized in every company. At least in marine electronics, the folks who actually develope and market the products don’t seem to pay much attention (unless it affects their R&D and ad budgets, which is sometimes an unfortunate side effect).

  5. thedon says:

    I am guessing I may be seeing a different point of NMEA Awards then. Maybe they are actually awarding innovation rather than the best of?
    But if they are awarding the best of and they cant possible view all products entered, maybe they should change it to the “Best of the things we tested/saw/played with”….
    Is there anywhere we can find the reasons behind the awards? Eg, this won that because of these points?

  6. Labozza says:

    The Don,
    The NMEA awards are awarded to the BEST in class, voted by as Ben mentioned this year a panel of 50 carefully vetted expert voters. The BWI Technology Award, in which Ben has participated in, is strictly for Innovation. I was surprised by a lot of the winners of these years awards, but each voter was responsible for evaluating every nomination thoroughly and using field experience and technical specifications. Do I think the best product won in each catagory? No, but that’s my personal opinion, and just like the baseball and NFL HOF, the Oscars, and even the Daytime Emmys, there will always be disagreements over who won what. The end result, which is the best part, is each nominee that didn’t win will continue to try and improve their products not just for an award, but to be the best. That’s the beauty of competition, and it’s a win-win for everyone, especially the end user.

  7. Bill Bishop says:

    Just a few words about the the judging process for the NMEA Technology award. The packets we receive are a considerable pile of reading material to sort through. Each entry gets as much of the judges time as they need to explain the hows and whys of their entry. A simple product might take 15 or twenty minutes. A more complex product may take much more time. This year it took two days to do the vendor visits. The previous year it took three days, As Ben mentioned, there are four criteria, of which innovation is the first.
    If it was strictly innovation that we looked at you might have a different winner. Factoring in value, benefit to the boater, and practicality changes the picture, and in my personal opinion creates a more well rounded winner.
    After all of the interviews we separate and do our scoring, and then we meet. As a rule of thumb a half dozen entries will have risen to the top of the lists, and a spirited discussion occurs to winnow the list down to the top three, and then with consensus the order is selected.
    Each judge sees things a bit differently, and the differing perspectives are good. This is not a casual process and we all work very hard at it. Judges are not paid, we volunteer to do it. Our hotel room is provided, we get meal expenses, and $350 towards airfare (somewhat short in my case). In the real world it costs all of us money out of pocket to do this, but I consider it a privilege to participate.

  8. Rick R says:

    Furuno’s application to the International Trade Commission is probably just a tactic to force Garmin, Navico, and Raymarine to settle a patent dispute. But if Furuno is successful and forces their competition out of the US market, I predict a consumer backlash. Furuno may win the battle, but they will be heading for a PR train wreck.

  9. thedon says:

    Ah, now I get it. Its not just a Best of Award. Thank you guys for clarifying this.
    I guess firing off opinions without first knowing the process is not the best idea :).
    I still don’t think an app should have won it though 😉
    Cheers.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.